On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 2:41 PM Nicolas George <geo...@nsup.org> wrote:
> Paul B Mahol (12019-05-04): > > I open votes for 7 days. Voting is about inclusion of scaletempo > > filter (IMHO it is better than atempo) in FFmpeg. > > > > Thanks for voting. > > Voting for what? This mail does not look remotely like the voting > procedure. For starters, a vote must come after a discussion failed to > reach a consensus. AFACS, this is the first time scaletempo is mentioned > on this mailing list this year. > An earlier post referring to scaletempo, from December 2017, suggested replacement of atempo. Please may I note that at least one commercial radio station, that I personally broadcast on daily, uses atempo for adjusting the timing of news bulletins so they exactly fit a particular time. A change in its operation, rather than the addition of a new filter, may cause concern at least that one place. Is there a patch I can use to test scaletempo to compare it against atempo? It'll be no trouble to do that with the normal audio that is time-adjusted on that radio station. It may be that its increased quality is most welcome, of course. with best wishes, JW _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
