May 10, 2019, 8:59 PM by ceffm...@gmail.com: > Am Fr., 10. Mai 2019 um 19:54 Uhr schrieb Lynne <> d...@lynne.ee > <mailto:d...@lynne.ee>> >: > >> >> May 10, 2019, 4:14 PM by >> d...@lynne.ee <mailto:d...@lynne.ee>>> : >> >> > Patch updated again. >> > Made some more cleanups to the transforms, the tables and the main context. >> > API changed again, now the init function populates the function pointer >> > for transform. >> > I decided that having a separate function would encourage bad usage (e.g. >> > calling >> > the function every time before doing a transform rather than storing the >> > pointer) when >> > we're trying to avoid the overhead of function calls. >> > Also adjusted file names to match the API. >> > >> >> Forgot to change an include, new patch attached. >> > > If I understand the commit message correctly, some of the code > in the new file you are adding comes from other parts of FFmpeg. > I am surprised that there is no copyright claim on the top of this > new file. > Is there none on top of the files you took the code from? >
The project isn't consistent with updating nor putting copyright headers on files so I'd rather keep the headers clean. Commit messages and authors are the only way to know who authored what. I could credit the authors fully in the commit message, then authorship can still be tracked and the headers will be clean. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
