> -----Original Message----- > From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On Behalf > Of Paul B Mahol > Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2019 4:24 PM > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches <ffmpeg- > de...@ffmpeg.org> > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2] lavfi/lut: Add slice threading > support > > On 5/29/19, Song, Ruiling <ruiling.s...@intel.com> wrote: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: ffmpeg-devel [mailto:ffmpeg-devel-boun...@ffmpeg.org] On > Behalf > >> Of Jun Zhao > >> Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2019 10:33 AM > >> To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > >> Cc: Jun Zhao <mypopy...@gmail.com> > >> Subject: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH V2] lavfi/lut: Add slice threading support > >> > >> V2: - update comments > >> > >> Jun Zhao (1): > >> lavfi/lut: Add slice threading support > >> > >> libavfilter/vf_lut.c | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > --- > >> ------- > >> 1 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 113 deletions(-) > > I have attached the patch which I would like to happen. > > I only test lutyuv on 1080p input, seems the performance penalty is less > > than 5%. > > I would like also hear performance numbers from your environment. > > I am not sure do you like the patch? > > > > You should use function pointers. Do you mean function pointer for the per-pixel function? I think function pointer will introduce extra burden of function call per each pixel, while for now, the xxx_pixel_8/16 is just inlined.
> _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
