Am 05.08.19 um 21:16 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:12 PM Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de>
> wrote:
>
>> Am 05.08.19 um 21:07 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 9:01 PM Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 05.08.19 um 21:00 schrieb Paul B Mahol:
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 8:57 PM Thilo Borgmann <thilo.borgm...@mail.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 05.08.19 um 20:46 schrieb Eugene Lyapustin:
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eugene Lyapustin <unishi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> doc/filters.texi | 137 +++
>>>>>>> libavfilter/Makefile | 1 +
>>>>>>> libavfilter/allfilters.c | 1 +
>>>>>>> libavfilter/vf_vr360.c | 1847
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +AVFilter ff_vf_vr360 = {
>>>>>>> + .name = "vr360",
>>>>>>> + .description = NULL_IF_CONFIG_SMALL("Convert 360 projection of
>>>>>> video."),
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "vr360" does not make any sense to me. VR and 360 degree are two
>>>> different
>>>>>> things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And since VR-related filters may very well emerge in the future, we
>>>> should
>>>>>> be as clear as possible about these.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Isnt VR just 360 but for each eye?
>>>>
>>>> That would be stereoscopic 360.
>>>>
>>>> What makes it VR is that the camera can move within space, not only
>> change
>>>> viewing direction.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, than vr360 stands for Video processoR 360.
>>> What name should be instead?
>>
>> "mono360" could make sense if a "stereo360" would process two inputs (that
>> are not L-R or T-B coded)
>>
>> Or just "video360"... but we really should save us "vr" for the future.
>>
>
> v360 then?
Works for me.
-Thilo
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
