Hi,
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Saturday, 10 de August de 2019 20:05, Andreas Håkon <andreas.ha...@protonmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gyan and Nicolas, > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Saturday, 10 de August de 2019 17:13, Nicolas George geo...@nsup.org wrote: > > > Gyan (12019-08-10): > > > > > Since both pts and dts are altered, avoid pts only labels. > > > > Dissenting opinion: PTS is the important thing, and there are lot of > > places where we says PTS because TS is ambiguous (Transport Stream?). > > DTS is just an annoying technical tidbit that goes with PTS. > > Regards, > > I agree with Nicolas: the change of the DTS value is a consequence of changing > the PTS value, as the second is correlated with the first. It doesn't have > sense > to change only one (at least, as far as a bitstream filter is concerned). > > So my preference is to overcome "TS" in the name of this filter. > > In any case, I prefer to listening more comments from others: "timeshift", > "pts_offest" or "editpts"? > I finally chose to use the name "editpts". I'll post the final patch soon. Regards. A.H. --- _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
