According to wiki, g.722.1 is not variants of G.722 and they use different patented compression technologies.
There is a reference code in ITU-T https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-G.722.1-200505-I/en and the freeswitch version is a wrapper with cleaner api. (I recently contacted the freeswitch guy and got permission) so I think the source code is ok to use. The codec itself is licensed by Polycom so I agreed it should be notified to user. How can I mark the new external codec as “nonfree” in configure? Any document about that? I also found old thread about "Differences between Cook and G.722.1" https://lists.ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2007-May/034060.html I can find CODEC_ID_COOK but not G722_1 so maybe they turned out to be different. 2019년 9월 17일 (화) 오후 5:27, Moritz Barsnick <barsn...@gmx.net>님이 작성: > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 09:52:48 +0200, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > > But that said: ffmpeg already has a native G.722 encoder (and decoder), > > > > See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G.722.1 > > The numbering... > > Yes, my next paragraph referred to that. But I just figured out that > G.722 was apparently differently licensed, and therefore it was > probably quite straightforward to port libg722 to ffmpeg, unlike this > G.722.1 code or codec. > > > (The library is non-free and we cannot change that.) > > Indeed. > > Moritz > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-devel mailing list > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
