On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:28:47AM +0200, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 16:34:37 +0200, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > If you want to support both interpretations, you'd need to search for > > > two different boundaries now. Quite some bloat, if you ask me. I don't > > > know if it's worth the effort, i.e. whether this will even hit anyone, > > > as "-strict_mime_boundary" is off by default. > > > > I hoped that this server version can easily be detected so only one > > search is needed > > Sure, it announces itself in the reply headers with > Server: Motion/X.Y.Z > > I'm not sure ffmpeg evaluates all headers yet. The boundary is fetched > from the headers of the URL with > > av_opt_get(pb, "mime_type", AV_OPT_SEARCH_CHILDREN, &mime_type); > > Otherwise we'd need the heuristics named in the previous mail. > > > > I vote against, but I probably don't decide. > > > > I abstain from voting, was more a thought that more stuff working out > > of the box wouldnt be bad > > Who decides, and who pushes? Can we perhaps get this patch set through > and fix this up later?
ok, will apply thx [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Asymptotically faster algorithms should always be preferred if you have asymptotical amounts of data
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
