> Am 12.11.2019 um 04:01 schrieb James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>:
>
>> On 11/11/2019 2:36 PM, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Am 11.11.2019 um 22:36 schrieb James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> +AVInputFormat ff_obu_demuxer = {
>>> + .name = "obu",
>>
>> Why is the demuxer not called “av1”?
>>
>> Thank you, Carl Eugen
>> (Sleepless in Japan)
>
> I liked obu more, being the extension used for Annex B encapsulated
> samples, but i'm fine changing it to av1 if others prefer that.
I would have preferred av1 ...
>
> The problem will be what to do with the eventual raw Section 5 OBU demuxer.
... but I have no idea what the Section 5 demuxer is (or which one of the two
is more likely to need on occasion demuxer forcing).
Carl Eugen
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-devel mailing list
ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
