vivien anglesio (12019-12-20): > I would like to work on a "per output" -progress option. I will try to > implement this myself but before putting my hands on it I wanted to discuss > about the different solutions with the community. I have three of them in > mind
I would not object to this, although I doubt it will be very useful. > Proposition 1. to put all output progress feedback in the same progress > payload That could be dangerous: the payload will become large, possibly needing bigger buffers, or not fitting in a single packet. > Proposition 2.to change the behavior of the progress option. make it an > output option instead of a global option > Proposition 3.to create a new per output progress option in order to do not > break the current API Proposition 3 is clearly superior to proposition 2, and seems to be the most reasonable. Another possibility is to add another global option to toggle between current behavior and new behavior. ffmpeg -progress $address -progress-details > I also wanted to add the duration of each output in the progress payload. > Actually we can not infer the duration from the frame count because we are > not always aware of the framerate. I think the duration is already there: out_time(_us). Regards, -- Nicolas George
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
