Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 02:09 Uhr schrieb Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: > > On 24/02/2020 00:37, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am Mo., 24. Feb. 2020 um 01:25 Uhr schrieb Mark Thompson <s...@jkqxz.net>: > > > >> We seem to have agreement that the Y210 / wider YUYV is fine > > > > Why do you think so? > > I was under the impression that we have agreement that this > > has to be discussed further. > > All of the dispute was about the bit-packed formats
That's not how I remembered it and I would like to remind you that while uncontroversial patches in general need no approval at all controversial patches can only be approved on the mailing list, not on irc. (Funny that the link you provided completely contradicts your argument) Note that I don't really care, I simply remember people arguing in the past that we have too many pix_fmts and that we recently agreed we want to discuss with Intel why we have to treat them differently than the other hardware manufacturers. This agreement was made after we were asked to meet because it was claimed we need new mechanisms to discuss technical questions. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
