Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 12:34 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro>: > > > > On 18-03-2020 02:44 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > > Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 07:04 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro>: > >> On 14-03-2020 07:15 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>> Am Sa., 14. März 2020 um 14:24 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi <ffm...@gyani.pro>: > >>>> On 14-03-2020 06:11 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>>>> Am Sa., 14. März 2020 um 13:19 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi > >>>>> <ffm...@gyani.pro>: > >>>>>> On 14-03-2020 04:29 pm, Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote: > >>>>>>> Am Sa., 14. März 2020 um 07:31 Uhr schrieb Gyan Doshi > >>>>>>> <ffm...@gyani.pro>: > >>>>>>>> As per https://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/ > >>>>>>>> --- > >>>>>>>> src/download | 2 +- > >>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> diff --git a/src/download b/src/download > >>>>>>>> index 6292a7e..d9155ee 100644 > >>>>>>>> --- a/src/download > >>>>>>>> +++ b/src/download > >>>>>>>> @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ > >>>>>>>> <h3>Linux Static Builds</h3> > >>>>>>>> <div class="list-group"> > >>>>>>>> <a class="list-group-item" > >>>>>>>> href="https://johnvansickle.com/ffmpeg/";>32-bit and > >>>>>>>> - 64-bit for kernel 2.6.32 and above</a> > >>>>>>>> + 64-bit for kernel 3.2.0 and above</a> > >>>>>>> Shouldn't we instead remove the line? > >>>>>> Why? > >>>>> Because we cannot know which kernel version the binaries currently > >>>>> require > >>>> We know, because the provider mentions it. > > I should probably mention that I don't think this was a very useful comment. > > > >>>>> Are we mentioning that the Zeranoe binaries do not work on XP? > >>>> Or on Vista, as mentioned by the provider. That should be noted. > >>>> > >>>> As long as the qualifications don't get too verbose, no harm in > >>>> adding/maintaining the practice. > >>> I believe it is better if Zeranoe and johnvansickle mention it, we > >>> should remove the existing line. > >> They already so. So have we, for some years now. Why haven't > >> you removed it yet? > > Why haven't you fixed a few user-reported bugs lately? > > Sorry, I really don't understand your question. > > The current practice if mentioning kernel/OS thresholds has been in > place for some years now. You apparently have a problem with it. YAnd > you haven't pushed a patch to remove it. Why now?
I can only repeat: Imo, this is not a very constructive question. > >> In any case, the current line is wrong. So it has to be either updated > >> or removed. I propose updating it. > > You know how much I hate the word here but the "cleaner" solution > > to me seems to simply remove the mentioning of the kernel. > > Do you want to remove the OS versions from Mac/Win links as well? An alternative would be to mention non-supported kernel and os versions (instead of supported). Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
