Steve Lhomme: > From: Steve Lhomme <rob...@ycbcr.xyz> > > So it's easier to match with the XSLT ordering which has limited possibilities > (15 max criteria for all the syntax tables). > I don't know XSLT at all, but this already raises alarm bells: If this is so restricted, then this whole approach might be a non-extensible dead-end. (I e.g. pondered to remove all those EBML_NONE elements that are not read at all at the moment from the syntax tables and instead add a pointer to a zero-delimited array of uint32_t that contains all* the EBML IDs of elements that may legitimately appear in said context, but which we don't care about (yet). (Both list_elem_size as well as data_offset of the sentinels are currently unused, so sizeof(EbmlSyntax) needn't be increased for this.) Would this even be possible with your approach?)
- Andreas *: The current tables don't include all these elements. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
