Francois Visagie <[email protected]> added the comment: On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Francois Visagie < [email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Vitor <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Vitor <[email protected]> added the comment: >> >> For windows binaries, check http://ffmpeg.arrozcru.org/builds/ and >> http://ffmpeg.arrozcru.org/autobuilds/blog/ . For other arches, there are >> plans >> of doing it using FATE, see >> http://multimedia.cx/eggs/archiving-binary-builds/ . >> >> > > Will do, thank you, Vitor. > I see on the FATE site they've started addressing issues like: how to delete expired versions, what configurations to build, etc. What would be fantastic eventually: configurations built on demand! I submit a configuration, the existing SVN builds are checked, if that configuration build exists, I get it, otherwise one is built and stored with the others. Kind regards, Francois _____________________________________________________ FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]> <https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue1110> _____________________________________________________
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Francois Visagie <[email protected]> wrote:
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Vitor <[email protected]> wrote:
Vitor <[email protected]> added the comment:
For windows binaries, check http://ffmpeg.arrozcru.org/builds/ and
http://ffmpeg.arrozcru.org/autobuilds/blog/ . For other arches, there are plans
of doing it using FATE, see http://multimedia.cx/eggs/archiving-binary-builds/ .
ÂÂWill do, thank you, Vitor.
Â
I see on the FATE site they've started addressing issues like: how to delete expired versions, what configurations to build, etc.
Â
What would be fantastic eventually: configurations built on demand! I submit a configuration, the existing SVN builds are checked, if that configuration build exists, I get it, otherwise one is built and stored with the others.
Â
Kind regards,
Francois
