Yunkwan <[email protected]> added the comment:

@lovenini

1. Here's a PLACE to figure out if Shooter Player is violating GPL.

2. And what we do really CARE about is whether Shooter Player is 
violationg GPL or not.

3. We would just like to FOCUS on GPL violation.

I don't think googling people's backgroud information is related to this 
issue. This will NEVER EVER CHANGE the FACT.

PLEASE PLEASE DO LOOK AT THE TITLE of this issue AGAIN.

I understand that you don't like what yegle did. The way he's doing this 
is probably not nice to the author of Shooter Player. I personally think 
that he should consult with the author first. You absolutely have right to 
hate yegle. However, we should face the fact that Shooter Player was 
REALLY violating GPL. 

I really appreciate that Tomasen has been trying to provide us a nice and 
powerful media player. 

PLEASE be calm and smile, if we are angry, we can't think clear and solve 
the problem, also we will keep hurting each other's feeling.   

I think people should have choice to choose what they want to use. And 
people should have right to know if Shooter Player is really under GPL.

Anyway, Yegle did help us find out the TRUTH. Shooter Player WAS violating 
the GPL. I am glad that Tomasen try to fix his mistake by publising all 
the source code. What Tomasen did shows us that he's willing to respect 
GPL and Opensource community.   

PLEASE STOP posting stuff that's off topic.
 
Why not google RMS and Linus Torvalds to try to understand why we are 
fighting for GPL. We just want to keep it with its spirit. 
The Code 
The OS Revolution 
These two movies are good to explain that why we are so strict about GPL. 
Because we love OpenSource.

_____________________________________________________
FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]>
<https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue1623>
_____________________________________________________

Reply via email to