Victor Hooi <[email protected]> added the comment:

heya,

I'm just going to chime in with my 2 cents.

Firstly, I think you guys are doing an awesome job with FFMPEG kudos to you.

However, with this whole exchange with MediaCoder/Stanley, as an objective 
neutral observer, you guys do 
realise you come across as being a bit...well... antagonistic?

I don't know if there were earlier exchange between Stanley and you, but just 
from what we (the public) 
can see on this thread, you guys seem pretty hostile, and aggressive. It's 
obvious that English isn't his 
first language, and he repeatedly asked for clarifications.

But it seems like it was pulling teeth - you could have just come out and said, 
"Oi, mate, make sure you 
put up the source code, and do this/that etc."  But you kept on trying to score 
points, and say, no, you 
read the license, he says, no, please tell me, you say, go away and read it. 
It's like the whole RTFM 
thing - sure, user's should read them, but look, occasionally it doesn't hurt 
to get off your high-horse 
and just you know, tell them?

And the repeated hammering of him, the belittling, the subtle insinuations and 
slurs, and the huge 
emphasis on him admitting fault - sorry, but it's like it's all about who's got 
the bigger gun, instead 
of actually trying to fix the issue.

And as somebody else pointed out, any lawyer worth his salt would tell him he'd 
be an idiot to publicly 
admit fault on his website. Sure, if this was a nice, amicable community, and 
we were all friendly and 
looking out for each other, that would work - but I think it's fairly obvious 
this flamewar left that 
point a long time ago.

I know, as coders, we often get accused of having a God/Messiah complex, or 
just being arrogant, annoying 
pricks - things like this don't help.

The flamewars on the Gnome mailing lists were pretty bad, the whole Novell-Mono 
fiasco, all the Apple 
ranting (I personally hate Apple, ideologically, and I don't think they're any 
friend to the OSS movmenet 
(e.g. KHTML/WebKit fiasco) but some of the stuff that spouts out of "our" side 
is really embarrassing).

I note this issue is still marked as opened. I checked out the website, I did 
see a link to source code, 
however, I didn't go in-depth. Can anybody list, in a nice concise list, what 
else he needs to still do 
to be compliant with you guys?

Cheers,
Victor

________________________________________________
FFmpeg issue tracker <[email protected]>
<https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/issue1162>
________________________________________________

Reply via email to