On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:37:12 +0200 (CEST)
conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Author: conrad
> Date: Fri Aug 10 01:37:12 2007
> New Revision: 656
>
> Log:
> Write the display size elements
>
>
> Modified:
> matroska/matroskaenc.c
>
> Modified: matroska/matroskaenc.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- matroska/matroskaenc.c (original)
> +++ matroska/matroskaenc.c Fri Aug 10 01:37:12 2007
> @@ -476,7 +476,10 @@ static int mkv_write_tracks(AVFormatCont
> // XXX: interlace flag?
> put_ebml_uint (pb, MATROSKA_ID_VIDEOPIXELWIDTH ,
> codec->width);
> put_ebml_uint (pb, MATROSKA_ID_VIDEOPIXELHEIGHT,
> codec->height);
> - // XXX: display width/height
> + if (codec->sample_aspect_ratio.num) {
> + put_ebml_uint(pb, MATROSKA_ID_VIDEODISPLAYWIDTH ,
> codec->sample_aspect_ratio.num);
> + put_ebml_uint(pb, MATROSKA_ID_VIDEODISPLAYHEIGHT,
> codec->sample_aspect_ratio.den);
I'm not sure, but I suppose that sample_aspect_ratio is something
different than videodisplaywidth/height.
I guess that you could have sample_aspect_ratio = 4/3 when
videodisplaywidth/height = 640/480.
Anyone can confirm?
Aurel
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
