On 20 Aug 2007, at 23:52, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 12:41:08AM +0200, reynaldo wrote:
>> --- qcelp/qcelpdata.h        (original)
>> +++ qcelp/qcelpdata.h        Tue Aug 21 00:41:08 2007
>> @@ -41,11 +41,11 @@
>>   * codebook vector index 'n' to get the desired circular codebook  
>> index but
>> - * It doesn't tell you have to clamp 'n' to [0-9] in order to get  
>> RI complaint
>> + * It doesn't tell you have to clamp 'n' to [0-9] in order to get  
>> RI compliant
>
> it

I'm not sure where you mean to put the 'it' but I think you're  
referring to the end of the sentence. Anyway, I would probably write  
something like:

The specification does not mention that you have to clamp the  
codebook vector index to [0-9] in order to obtain RI compliance.

...or retaining your style:

It doesn't say that you have to clamp 'n' to [0-9] in order to get RI  
compliance.

Rob
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc

Reply via email to