Hi On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 04:37:07PM +0200, Marco Gerards wrote: > Michael Niedermayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi, > > [...] > > >> Although my main concerns are with if I made the split correctly as in > >> code wise. > > > > after a quick 10min look it looks ok ... > > Great, thanks for this effort :-) > > > one thing i spoted where that there are non static things in there without > > a ff_ prefix but with just a dirac_ prefix these could break an application > > which tries to link to both ffmpeg and the official dirac > > Yes, you are right. At the same time I split the file, I introduced > this namespace for non-static symbols. I do not think the dirac_* > names collide with those of the reference implementation, but I can > not guarantee they won't. > > What would be a better prefix? dirac_ff_* or even ff_*? Or just leave > it as it is, until people start complaining? Personally I do not care > much about the prefix and will change it to whatever you like.
please use ff_dirac_* [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB I count him braver who overcomes his desires than him who conquers his enemies for the hardest victory is over self. -- Aristotle
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
