On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:23:33PM +0100, Benjamin Larsson wrote:
> Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> 
> > i dont know who on #ffmpeg-dev "approved" that but i do know they need their
> > head examined and suspect they never looked at the actual code before
> > approving it
> 
> I'll go to a shrink on monday then.

thank you


> The way we (I?) reasoned was that
> because the soc code was in quite bad shape (it has several bugs and
> buggy code for features other then just pure aac-lc) just leave it there
> and start a new repo with only the aac-lc code in. I see no reason to do
> this kind of transition in small incremental steps just to keep the
> diffs to a minimum when creating a new repo. The old history wont be
> that relevant anyway.

the problem is that some bad changes made it through also, it obscures
what has been written by andreas and what by previous authors

[...]

-- 
Michael     GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB

No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible. -- Voltaire

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc

Reply via email to