Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:09:08PM +0100, Benoit Fouet wrote:
>   
>> Diego Biurrun wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 07:03:43PM +0100, Vitor Sessak wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Benoit Fouet wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> vitor wrote:
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>>>> +--- cmdutils.c  (revision 11882)
>>>>>> ++++ cmdutils.c  (working copy)
>>>>>> +@@ -164,6 +165,7 @@
>>>>>> +     fprintf(stderr, "  libavcodec version: " 
>>>>>> AV_STRINGIFY(LIBAVCODEC_VERSION) "\n");
>>>>>> +     fprintf(stderr, "  libavformat version: " 
>>>>>> AV_STRINGIFY(LIBAVFORMAT_VERSION) "\n");
>>>>>> +     fprintf(stderr, "  libavdevice version: " 
>>>>>> AV_STRINGIFY(LIBAVDEVICE_VERSION) "\n");
>>>>>> ++    fprintf(stderr, "  libavfilter version: " 
>>>>>> AV_STRINGIFY(LIBAVFILTER_VERSION) "\n");
>>>>>>   
>>>>>>             
>>>>> shouldn't that be conditionnal to having libavfilter enabled ?
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Indeed. Done.
>>>>         
>>> Not that I necessarily disagree, but the libavdevice version for example
>>> is printed unconditionally...
>>>       
>> IMHO, this should be fixed in ffmpeg svn, no ?
>>     
>
> That would be the place to fix it, yes.  Send a patch.
>
>   

that means a patch to the configure script I am not able to deal with,
like adding a ENABLE_LIBAVDEVICE

-- 
Ben
Purple Labs S.A.
www.purplelabs.com
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc

Reply via email to