Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:12:46PM +0100, Benjamin Larsson wrote: >> Diego Biurrun wrote: >>> On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:40:50PM +0100, banan wrote: >>>> --- (empty file) >>>> +++ dcaenc/dcaenc.c Thu Mar 20 14:40:49 2008 >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,379 @@ >>>> +/* >>>> + * DCA encoder >>>> + * Copyright (C) 2008 Alexander E. Patrakov >>>> + * >>>> + * This file is part of FFmpeg. >>>> + * >>>> + * When this file is part of FFmpeg it can be licensed under the LGPL 2.1 >>>> + * currently it is a wip >>> Houston, we have a problem here. First off, the first and the second >>> sentence are a contradiction. Second, FFmpeg is (mostly) licensed as >>> LGPL 2.1+, so this code would cause license incompatibilities... >>> >>> So can we have this as standard LGPL 2.1+ please? >> Fixed. > > That was only a partial fix. Now the promise is for LGPL 2.1, but > FFmpeg is LGPL 2.1+ ... > > Why this "when this code ever enters the magic wonderland, I shall > bestow a free license upon it" in the first place? Get the author to > release this as LGPL 2.1+.
He did, when the code enters the FFmpeg code base. I just wanna respect his wishes. > If somebody cleans this up and integrates it > into multimedia lib XYZ, it would be without a license grant... > > Diego MvH Benjamin Larsson _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
