On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 08:29:00PM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Replying here just for the record. > > Keiji Costantini wrote: > > I took a look at sequent files in libswscale directory: > > > > Makefile > > swscale.h > > swscale.c > > swscale_internal.h > > swscale-example.c > > > > During the project I am told to *not* read the file "yuv2rgb.c". If > > there are other files not to read, it would be nice to know that. For > > now, I'm checking that every file I open contains an LGPL header or the > > permission of utilization under LGPL (as swscale.c). > > I'm not sure, Michael I guess that this is the only one taboo (I'll try > to split out the stuff he could read to ease the work)
The GPL->LGPL rewrite was not my idea so ill leave this entirely to you luca, to figure out what needs to be rewritten, what can be looked at and what not. > > > regarding "swscale-example.c" and "swscale_internal.h" > > swscale-example.c includes swscale_internal.h which, according to > > Makefile, is not public. Could test function inside "swscale-example.c" > > be split from the file to have a clean "example" about using swscale > > (Just took about 1/2 hour to understand why it is there)? > > I'd like to have the test routine split and have a test target as well. > That could be one of the first commit. I assume you guys mean with "split" to outcomment sws_format_name()? If so yes i also want it "splited". [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Complexity theory is the science of finding the exact solution to an approximation. Benchmarking OTOH is finding an approximation of the exact
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
