On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 11:04:36AM +0200, Guillaume POIRIER wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:08 AM, Kostya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > > > > For now I just have hardcoded lambda parameter. By adjusting it one > > can obtain desired bitrate, by not touching it - desired quality. > > Is this the hardcoded lambda ? > ./aacenc.c:1017: s->lambda = 5e-7f;
it is > If not, what should I touch to modify the lambda. Also, how do quality > relates to quality in AACenc? If you raise it you lower the encoding > quality? no, higher lambda -> more quality and vice versa > > I will try to make it follow ABR in the near future. > > Outstanding! > > > > My task now is to create anchor for future practical implementation, > > which will be faster but less optimal. Until then we have CPU cycles > > waster ;) > > No problem. I don't care if it takes a lot of time to encode, since > this is done one time only, and I'll subsequently listen a lot to the > generated file. I still prefer it to be a little faster. > Guillaume _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
