On date Sunday 2009-03-22 19:10:34 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 09:11:58AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > On date Sunday 2009-03-22 02:49:12 +0100, Michael Niedermayer encoded: > > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 01:08:24AM +0100, Stefano Sabatini wrote: > > > > On date Sunday 2009-03-22 01:05:42 +0100, stefano encoded: > > > > > Author: stefano > > > > > Date: Sun Mar 22 01:05:42 2009 > > > > > New Revision: 4179 > > > > > > > > > > Log: > > > > > Update to FFmpeg r18133. > > > > > > > > > > Modified: > > > > > libavfilter/checkout.sh > > > > > libavfilter/diffs/01_ffplay_filters.diff > > > > > libavfilter/diffs/02_ffmpeg_filters.diff > > > > > > > > This breaks regression for mxf_d10. > > > > > > > > It is expected, since that test uses -padtop, which works differently > > > > from the one in FFmpeg (also the soc one looks broken). > > > > > > he?! > > > there should be no -pad* in libavfilter svn because that should be done > > > by filters. > > > > Do you mean that the various -padXXX options should be removed from > > ffmpeg.c right now? > > from soc libavfilter ffmpeg yes thats an option > > > > > > Only problem is that regression test then will fail, so I suggest to > > wait up to when will have a pad filter. > > id suggest to drop all pad options from the regression tests
So the question is why the mxf_d10 test uses -padtop in the first place. Regards. _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
