2009/7/8 Alex Converse <alex.conve...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Diego Biurrun<di...@biurrun.de> wrote:
[...] >> Yes, that's why it is crap and needs to be replaced. The 3GPP AAC >> encoder has just one license: prohibitively nonfree. There is really >> nothing more to say about it... >> >> What is your point exactly? > > It's the best AAC encoder with source available. I don't see a path to > merging our AAC encoder anytime in the near future. It may be the best AAC encoder with the source available, but I disagree that there's no path to merging ours. > I also think we are getting to the point where an encoder without SBR > is a bit of a joke. I definitely disagree with this. People more commonly use higher bit rates, and so LC, for stereo AAC audio in video content. SBR is pretty much needed for multi-channel audio at reasonable bit rates though. And for music, LC AAC is definitely preferred. Regards, Rob PS - I have more comments to make in this thread but I'm a bit busy at the moment. _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list FFmpeg-soc@mplayerhq.hu https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
