Hi, On Mittwoch, 12. August 2009, Diego Biurrun wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:50:28PM +0200, Sascha Sommer wrote: > > On Mittwoch, 12. August 2009, Benoit Fouet wrote: > > > faust3 wrote : > > > > --- wmapro/wmaprodec.c Wed Aug 12 20:51:19 2009 (r5042) > > > > +++ wmapro/wmaprodec.c Wed Aug 12 20:55:40 2009 (r5043) > > > > @@ -276,12 +276,10 @@ static av_cold int decode_init(AVCodecCo > > > > -#ifdef DEBUG > > > > /** dump the extradata */ > > > > for (i=0 ; i<avctx->extradata_size ; i++) > > > > - av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "[%x] > > > > ",avctx->extradata[i]); - av_log(avctx, AV_LOG_DEBUG, "\n"); > > > > -#endif > > > > + dprintf(avctx, "[%x] ",avctx->extradata[i]); > > > > + dprintf(avctx, "\n"); > > > > > > instead of generating no code at all, this will be a loop of nop, is it > > > really what you want ? > > > > It should not really matter as it is called only once during init. > > Besides that this code will now also work when dprintf no longer depends > > on DEBUG. > > How would dprintf not depend on DEBUG? >
This might happen when someone changes the dprintf implementation in the future. Imo it should not matter if dprintf is enabled by the preprocessor define DEBUG or some mechanism. Regards Sascha _______________________________________________ FFmpeg-soc mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
