On 05/11/2010 03:18 PM, Stefano Sabatini wrote:
On date Wednesday 2010-05-12 00:10:28 +0200, Vitor Sessak encoded:
Víctor Paesa wrote:
Hi
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 21:46, Vitor Sessak wrote:
Baptiste Coudurier wrote:
Guys,
What do you think about it ?
Looks a good idea to me, unless someone comes up with an even better name.
Well, strictly speaking, not only files are supported.
But for me "file" is still the least misleading. For example, in
"ffmpeg -h":
-i filename input file name
We already call [file|URL|video4windows device number] a "file"...
Exactly. What we're really taking in input is a lavf
resource/source/stream.
Maybe vsrc_stream, but I continue to prefer "lavf" as it is using the
lavf syntax/capabilities.
I think users don't really know about lavf, it won't be obvious for them
at all...
--
Baptiste COUDURIER
Key fingerprint 8D77134D20CC9220201FC5DB0AC9325C5C1ABAAA
FFmpeg maintainer http://www.ffmpeg.org
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-soc mailing list
FFmpeg-soc@mplayerhq.hu
https://lists.mplayerhq.hu/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-soc
