#3651: UT Video Codec is inefficient compared to libutvideo
-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Reporter: Zerowalker | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: open
Priority: wish | Component: avcodec
Version: git-master | Resolution:
Keywords: utvideo | Blocked By:
Blocking: | Reproduced by developer: 1
Analyzed by developer: 0 |
-------------------------------------+-----------------------------------
Comment (by cehoyos):
Replying to [comment:10 Zerowalker]:
> Is it possible to make a benchmark using the same file?
Isn't this what I have done?
Or do I misunderstand?
> You see i got a file that's UT Video RGB.
That is what I tested or am I missing something?
Do you agree that in my comment:5 and my comment:9 I confirm your original
post or is there still something unconfirmed about your utvideo issue?
As said the lagarith issue is different and while performance improvements
are always possible, the (non-portable and non-future-proof) original
decoder will probably always be faster than our (portable and future-
proof) lagarith decoder.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/3651#comment:11>
FFmpeg <https://ffmpeg.org>
FFmpeg issue tracker
_______________________________________________
FFmpeg-trac mailing list
[email protected]
http://avcodec.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-trac
