On 28 Sep 2014, at 13:13, Henk D. Schoneveld <belca...@zonnet.nl> wrote:
> > On 26 Sep 2014, at 18:36, Ryan M <rymerr...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I am putting together hardware to encode a large and ever growing catalog >> of video using ffmpeg/x264. Much of the source video is 1080p ProResHQ. >> Currently I have a box with a Haswell 4770k CPU which gets around 12-15 >> fps, I am of course looking to increase that as much as possible. > Have a look at > http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-5960X+%40+3.00GHz&id=2332 > and compare with > http://www.cpubenchmark.net/cpu.php?cpu=Intel+Core+i7-4770K+%40+3.50GHz&id=1919 > or in 1 view > http://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare.php?cmp[]=1919&cmp[]=2364 > 7 times the price for less then 2 times the performance. > Spreading the task over more much cheaper CPU’s gives you more bang for the > buck if realtime encoding isn’t needed. > You could use 8 Dual Celeron systems to get the same performance as 1 > E5-2690 where CPU cost would be 8x52.45 vs. 1x2299.99 Of course motherboards > etc are needed and housing but a low cost MB and Housing can be bought at < > 100.00 a piece. 8*(100+52.45) ~ 1220.00 > Saved more then $1.000 And the Xeon still needs a motherboard and case of > course. The CPU Mark and single thread performance are good indicators for relative ffmpeg encoding speeds. I do have i5 i7 and the named Celerons which I compared extensively with the same source files and encoding parameters. Disk I/O isn’t any problem, think of it, 5 times BluRay bitrates results in 90Kb/s < 12MB/s. Every modern disk has no problem with that and even old-fashioned nics, 100Mb/s can cope with that. >> >> Trying to determine if getting the latest dual CPU Xeon (such as E5-2690 >> v3) setup is going to be worth the significant additional cost over the >> best Haswell-E (Core i7-5960X). >> >> I've read lots of articles/posts and it is not clear to me. I know worth >> is subjective but looking to know if there'll be significant increase in >> fps using 2 Xeons. I need to justify the $6-7k price tag. >> >> Any insight/experience would be appreciated. >> >> thanks >> Ryan >> _______________________________________________ >> ffmpeg-user mailing list >> ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org >> http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user