On 12/21/2014 8:53 PM, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > My bad, thanks for the clarification. You needn't apologize at all, your help is very notable.
> I think I had this thread in the back of my mind: > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2014-May/021412.html > > which introduces use of the idet filter to detect interlacing (type). Wow, I didn't know about this: it solves my problem even much more better. > So Jan (the OP) will have to check what applies to his material. Timeline-editing is exactly what I asked for, but you wrote me about even better solution (previous note). So in other words both solutions are excellent but the first is better ;-), marking as SOLVED. Many thanks to everybody, you solved the problem faster than very quickly. Jan Sever P.S. Sorry for keeping you waiting so long for my answer, I had to unmask newer version of ffmpeg first (in Gentoo ffmpeg-2 is still marked as unstable), recompile it and test both solutions (I didn't have a usable mixed record with both progressive and interlaced frames /big compression prevented from detection of interlacing/, so I made it from two). _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user