Jason Freets <jasonslife <at> hotmail.com> writes: > > > So either on Linux or Windows, I still don't get a > > > correct conversion that views correctly. > > > > Don't you agree that it would be a problem if you get > > different output on Widows and Linux? > > I am getting the same output on Windows and Linux: the > r10k to FFV1 both play incorrectly.
Note that if you mention ffv1 like this, some (most/all) readers will - as I did and Peter - assume that you believe you found an issue with ffv1. I only realize now that you (believe you) found an issue with r10k that has nothing to do with ffv1. > In other words, I am not getting different outputs.... > but the same output. As said, I am quite happy you get identical output on Windows and Linux;-) > They both play just as bad as the screenshots provided. (Note that what you call "bad" is what I see when I open the file you provided with hex editor...) > > Does the software that plays the colourbars correctly > > also play the following files? > > http://samples.ffmpeg.org/V-codecs/R10g.mov > > http://samples.ffmpeg.org/V-codecs/R10k.mov > > No, I've never been able to play R10K. I've not > tried R10g either. What software created the sample you uploaded and how can I watch it (the way you see it)? > Apparently there are different formats: > > R10k (Big Endian) > R10g (Big Endian) > r10k (Little Endian) > r10g (Little Endian) How do you know? I am not saying you are wrong but I would like to understand this better. > For example, I notice that the R10K > (http://samples.ffmpeg.org/V-codecs/R10k.mov) is > Big Endian whereas the r10k's I've been sharing > with you are Little Endian. How do you know that your sample is little-endian? > It's just to say, I notice the FFMpeg has no r10k samples! Until now, I assumed we do have samples (and that there is no difference between R10k and r10k). Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
