Hi, I'm testing converting my h.264 movies to h.265 using ffmpeg
(2.5.2
64-bit static):
Why?
Sorry, I don't get the question. Does that sound a stupid idea? Is that
something ffmpeg wasn't designed for?
I was mainly looking to test (video) quality in comparison die h.264.
And should it be similar (to me), I might start think about converting
the movies here to save space.
ffmpeg -i "${TARGET}" -c:a copy -c:v libx265 -preset slow -x265-params
crf=24 -strict experimental "${TARGET}.mp4"
You should always include the complete console output too.
Really? For encoding almost 2 hourse of movie, that's going to be quite
an amount of data...!
I had hoped that this would transcode the video stream, keeping all
audio streams. But only one audio stream is kept, the others are
deleted:
See http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html#Stream-selection
Then http://ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg.html#Advanced-options (particularly the
first example)
Thanks, so I'll need another -map 0, right?
ffmpeg -i "${TARGET}" -map 0 -c:a copy -c:v libx265 -preset slow
-x265-params crf=24 -strict experimental "${TARGET}.mp4"
Cheers, Chris
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
