> I am stil looking around for other solutions, but the idea is to > combine 30 images of 500x500 to a combined total image of 2500x3000 > pixels. The reason I would like to use ffmpeg for is the batchfile > automation. The smaller images change content so the new total map > needs to be updated when that happens. Stitching these images > everytime in photoshop can be time consuming. While ffmpeg could do > it in 5 seconds. I'll try to use the advice I have read sofar.
Hi, i think, imagemagick is better suited for the job when it comes to still images. See: http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/montage/#geometry_size Greetings, Frank. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
