Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote > marcjn > gmail.com> writes:> I could submit sample and logIf you don't submit > them, help is extremely unlikely afaict.(This is of course not pullup > related.)Carl > Eugen_______________________________________________ffmpeg-user mailing > list
> ffmpeg-user@ > http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user I don't see my recent mails to the list posted here so I will try from my browser (I am new to this mail list format).I have been trying to convert a telecined clip (29.97 fps) to a progressive one (23.976 fps).The clip I am using for test purpose is here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4 <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4> The sample contains a x.264 video stream and an AAC 2-channel audio stream. I first tried to use -vf pullup, fps=24000/1001: The log is here <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps.log> The result was a 23.976 fps clip, showing up as 'progressive' with MediaInfo, but with 2 progressive frames, followed by 2 frames each blending 2 fields (combing). I also tried -vf pullup -r 24000/1001 as some users mentioned that this worked for them:Here is the log: here <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_rate.log> The result was the same: 2 progressive frames followed by 2 blended ones. I then tried -vf fieldmatch,decimate: The log is here <https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/fieldmatch_decimate.log> Different result here: most of the time, we have 3 progressive + 1 blended frame, but on occasion 2 progressive + 2 blended.I do hope someone knows how to make IVCT work under ffmpeg.Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669243.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
