On 07/25/2015 11:53 AM, MrNice wrote: >> The standard approach to this kind of issue is to use (as close to) > losslessly encoded intermediate files as possible. I.e. either use a > codec designed for lossless encoding such as "HuffYUV", or use something > like x264 with "lossless" settings. > Why do you add " " around lossless for x264. Is x264 still lossy even > with "lossless" setting?
Don't worry: x264-lossless is really lossless. At least, according to my tests: http://download.das-werkstatt.com/pb/mthk/info/video/comparison_video_codecs_containers.html#codec_tests What might also be interesting is, that these tests show that FFV1.3 encodes and decodes a lot faster than x264-lossless: encoding/decoding FPS: x264: 94 / 190 fps FFV1.3: 216 / 277 fps > BTW what is/are it/they? What do you mean? Kind regards, Pb _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
