MrNice <wxcvbn2006 <at> iol.ie> writes: > From an interlaced input (video tape) is it > possible to capture interlaced video file > encoded with FFV1
What device or software is delivering the input to FFmpeg? Whatever it is, it will provide frames (because FFmpeg only accepts frames as input). > (using -flags +ilme+ildct)? These are flags intended to optimize encoding for some codecs. The test in the mailing list thread you linked indicated that there would be no gain implementing such flags. The more important question is: You are encoding frames with a lossless codec. Why do want to capture "interlaced video"? The lossless codec will encode your video and it will be interlaced after decoding if it was interlaced before encoding. Please understand that there is a difference between interlaced content and interlaced encoding. There is no interlaced encoding with FFv1 because it appears not to save any bytes in the output file and if you have interlaced content it will be still be interlaced. Most TV stations always use interlaced encoding where I live, no matter if the content is progressive or not. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
