> On 2016 Jan 5, at 3:13 PM, Jim Worrall <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Currently I just get an empty ffmpeg2pass-0.log and pass 1 is as slow as >> pass 2. As expected he result is worse as well. >> > Uh-oh, I thought that’s what was supposed to happen (except for the worse > result part). I thought libx264 worked that way. I better try it the other > way!
I just tested doing pass both ways. It is true that ffmpeg’s log appears to remain empty, while x265’s does not. But the output is identical as near as I can tell, and putting pass as an ffmpeg option was actually slightly faster (both passes about the same speed as opposed to pass 1 being a bit slower via x265-params. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
