juan carlos Rebate wrote:
2016-08-06 23:21 GMT+02:00 Moritz Barsnick <[email protected]>:
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 03:45:04 +0200, juan carlos Rebate wrote:
[libx264 @ 000000000253a860] kb/s:1030.90
That is less than one percent off your target. And it is to be
expected. That is definetly no bug. Have a read about VBR. Google is
your friend.
coding in two passes only makes the file has less loss of quality but still
not correct bitrate
Have a look at the ratetol option of x264 if you are so desperate for
that tiny difference. Or go for constant bitrate and have "fun" with
the quality you get.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
