Thanks, Carl Eugen. It looks like -r ntsc is perhaps a more user-friendly
alias and produces the same output as -r 30000/1001 (same md5 checksum).

> The "video" was encoded by a hardware encoder, the "held frame" by
> x264, you cannot concatenate them.

When you say "cannot concatenate" do you mean with "-c copy" or not at all?
Then what are my options instead, specifically what's the least processor-
intensive option here?

I have the same problem using the -r ntsc "held frame" as I did before.
Also, if I convert the files to mpegts, I seem to get the
same problems, although I have not broken this out rigorously.
    
> (ffprobe output is completely irrelevant here, it does not show
> technical details.)

Is there a better diagnostic tool I should be using to ascertain
what should be concatenate-able [concatenable?]?

Thanks.

--jh...@mit.edu
  John Hawkinson
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to