On 2017-11-29 08:58 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 29.11.2017 um 14:47 schrieb Thirumalaisamy K:
I know the difference between GPL and LGPL. But, in both you have to
disclose the sources including controlling scripts.
Just clear question whether it's required to release the control scripts
when one release a binary made from LGPL code?
please quote me the part of GPL which says i need to provide a bash
script which *calls* configure, set some params, install
build-requires and *not links* and line of code
I don't think the "script which *calls* configure" is necessary, but
please be aware....
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html#InstInfo
GPLv3 explicitly requires redistribution to include the full necessary
“Installation Information.” GPLv2 doesn't use that term, but it does
require redistribution to include "scripts used to control compilation
and installation of the executable" with the complete and corresponding
source code. This covers part, but not all, of what GPLv3 calls
“Installation Information.” Thus, GPLv3's requirement about installation
information is stronger.
Jon
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
