> […] > > With qmin4 there are still tiny blocks (looks better than qmin=1), and I > now from other transcoders that the frames were these tiny blocks happen > CAN BE better encoded so that no blocks are visible for the whole GOP. > My questions are: > 1.) Why do I get a better quality with qmin=4 instead of qmin=1? -> Maybe > is datarate saved with qmin=4 which can be used for other frames were it is > needed more? > 2.) How can I improve the encoding a little bit more here in ffmpeg > regarding the picture quality? >
Hi there, These are very interesting questions ! I can't explain the first point, but probably 2-pass encoding can improve encoding the way you want. If an expert can confirm and give a command line example, that would be perfect. Best, Fred _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
