2019-02-02 19:27 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de>: > > Am 02.02.19 um 18:38 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: >> 2019-02-01 23:46 GMT+01:00, Ulf Zibis <ulf.zi...@gmx.de>: >>> Am 30.01.19 um 15:08 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: >>>> Without interpolation, this is what all video players do if you disable >>>> all de-interlacing. >>>> The problem is what kind of "interpolation" you use, this is called >>>> de-interlacing, an endless number of algorithms exist. >>> OK, my understandig was, "de-interlacing" means to re-encode from >>> interlaced to progressive _and_ do some interpolation or whatever stuff. >> No, these are two completely independent operations, one of which >> hast nothing to do with de-interlacing. > > Correct. I wanted to say, that I was in error with my former understanding. > > But if I have a interlaced encoded stream with interlaced content, I > guess only both steps at same time ensure to get a progressive stream > with good visual quality.
No, this is simply not correct / a misunderstanding. The two "steps" are not related in the way your wording implies. Carl Eugen _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".