On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 13:18:57 +0530, AMIT KUMAR wrote: > Hi, > These two command line i am implementing. > > Command line : > > 1). "-i 588041.webm -i 588041.wav -filter_complex > [0:a][1:a]amix=inputs=2:duration=longest -preset ultrafast -vf > scale=1280:720 588041.mp4" //This one i implementing > > 2). "-i 588041.webm -i 588041.wav -filter_complex > [0:a][1:a]amix=inputs=2:duration=longest -preset ultrafast -r 24 -crf 8 > 588041.mp4".
You didn't understand correctly, Carl asked for the complete console output (a copy/paste of the text) from running the commands. > How does the output look if you use a silent sound generator, or when just > processing the video through without audio? > > --------------->>>>> Actually at the time of creation video that have an > already audio , and for that video i have an extra audio file so we merge > the extra audio file with video without echo produce. Again, you misunderstood the request. The question was: What happens if you omit muxing the WAV, in other words just recode the video. Does is also look blurry? I tried your conversion - to me, it does not look blurry at all, but very close to the original. (My ffmpeg encodes with libx264, perhaps yours does something different.) Please note that the original's resolution is 320x240, it won't look like HD if you scale it up to 1280x720. Moritz _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-user-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
