Am 11.03.19 um 11:58 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos: > So our suspicion after visual inspection was right. Yes, indeed.
>> So I buyed the DVD now. Except that it has 3 audio tracks to choose and >> the VHS head switching artefacts are missing, it unfortunately has the >> equal bad quality than my DVD recorder copy, but even has a worst colour >> quality than my copy. The purchased DVD is not a direct telecined copy >> from the 36 mm material (disappointing), it seem to be a capture of the >> in earlier times provided VHS cassette, but with a better adjusted VHS >> player, so the head switching artefacts are missing. > Thank you for the info! > Maybe you should buy a copy of the film? Hey hey, and additionally a telecine machine to have a digital copy. ;-) >> Is native vs. x264 encoder something different? > The native (FFmpeg-internal) encoders may be a little less > sophisticated than x264 (and they don't know a special > adaptive interlaced setting because it didn't exist in earlier > formats). Does ffmpeg still use the native encoder when omitting the -c:v libx264 option? I don't see any difference in the terminal output of ffmpeg or in the results with ffprobe. Or in other words, how can I determine, which encoder was used for transcoding or a given mp4? -Ulf _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
