Thank you Carl. Point taken. I will investigate making it optional, then we just have the operators knowledge to rely on… Many thanks too Reto.
Joanna > On 11 Sep 2019, at 21:37, Carl Eugen Hoyos <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am Mi., 11. Sept. 2019 um 14:08 Uhr schrieb Gyan <[email protected]>: > >> ffmpeg -i input_file -i watermark.png -filter_complex >> "[0]yadif=0:-1:1[v];[v][1]overlay" >> -c:v libx264 -pix_fmt yuv420p -c:a aac >> -metadata copyright=“blah” -metadata comment=“contact blah” >> -report output_file >> >> >> The yadif filter will only deinterlace if the frame is marked as interlaced. > > The metadata that marks frames as interlaced is typically wrong: > It will mark progressive frames as interlaced and the de-interlacer > will permanently damage the frames. > > Carl Eugen > _______________________________________________ > ffmpeg-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user > > To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email > [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe". _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
