Now I'm confused From my calculation: Audio length: 5580.7 seconds Video length: 133799/(24000/1001) = 5580.533292 seconds
From the container: Audio length: 5580.704 --> that is what ffmpeg tell me when I reencode the stream Video length: 5580.575 --> Adobe Premiere Pro showed me 133799 frames, but the container metadata 133800/(24000/1001) = 5580,575. Don't know why there is a difference ... And all audio streams of the blu-ray have an different duration: English: 5580.704 Swedish: 5580.694 But this difference is only in the end, or not? > Where did you get the original length from? Is "133799" the number of video > frames in the file? Does the audio track start at the same time as the video > track? Is it the same length as the video track? At least on a DVD the > asnwer to the the last > 2 question is not guaranteed to be "yes". 133799 is the total frame number Premiere told me. I don't know if it start at the same time, I think so, otherwise it would be out of sync. > Are you claiming you have corrected for both of those by trimming samples off > in some program? I didn't touch the stream only extracted from mkv which I've passthrough ripped from blu-ray disc. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
