On 1/31/20, william keeling <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why is FFMPEG use so much CPU vs native ALSA tools.  For example I am able
> to record using ALSA device and arecord at a sample rate of 96000 with no
> issues and using very little CPU. But FFMPEG must be at 22050 to not get
> buffer xrun errors and it uses 100% of one core of the PI.
>

Full uncut ffmpeg command and its output missing.

>
> Great tool even with this issue.
>
>
>
> Thanks
> _______________________________________________
> ffmpeg-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
>
> To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
> [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user

To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".

Reply via email to