Am 11.03.20 um 20:13 schrieb Carl Eugen Hoyos:
To elaborate:
The main differences are:
Unified support for >8 bit
Monochrome encoding
XAVC encoding
The first is really useful but only if you need 10 bit support,
the others should have less relevance.
x264 development has slowed down over time since the
encoder already was the best-in-class.
Thanks for your appraisal. So I think I can live with the 152 version.
But maybe that's the reason for this Problem:
https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/video-ruckelt-mit-totem-nicht-aber-mit-vlc
Is it thinkable that libx264 could encode with constrained_baseline
profile some day? Currently it only can decode it.
John's version is:
[libx264 @ 0x769d500] 264 - core 159 r2991 1771b55 - H.264/MPEG-4 AVC
codec - Copyleft 2003-2019 - http://www.videolan.org/x264.html
-Ulf
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
