On 04/13/2020 09:08 AM, System Administrator wrote:
On 13/04/2020 12:04, Nicolas George wrote:
Mark Filipak (12020-04-13):
Thanks, Kieran. I've given up. I have faith that the person who calls
himself richardpl will never allow me to submit a valid ffmpeg trac ticket.
For those who might be inclined to spend time helping this guy, for
reference, the ticket is:
http://trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/8612
and we can see that Richard made considerable efforts in trying to
reproduce the bug, without success, with an up-to-date version. And this
is the real reason the bug was closed.
Regards,
Nicolas George
It seems that his combative behaviour is elsewhere too:
https://github.com/HandBrake/HandBrake/issues/2318
Not combative...
There are 2 checkboxes. About those boxes...
Mark: "How do you want me to set those?"
Bradley: "Intel QSV (Quick Sync Video) is a hardware ASIC for both decoding and encoding video.
Sometimes the QSV decoder is tripped up by certain sources. If you disable the first option, your
video will instead be decoded in software, which is more reliable in most cases."
Bradley was simply not answering my questions. He was making statements. I tried to bring him back
to answering my question regarding how to set the checkboxes. That's not combative.
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/18035?cversion=2&cnum_hist=2
Not combative...
A ticket to oracle.com resulted in a compound misunderstanding that in the bottom frame, I
apologized for. Socratus is a moderator of forums.virtualbox.org. I had written to oracle.com
regarding how SSO (single sign-on) had wiped out the account I'd had for 10 years -- something that
happened all over the Net when SSO came in about 2 years ago. It had nothing to do with virtualbox.
I didn't know that my contact with Oracle would loop back to Socratus. It's that simple.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/questions/2yWYFaWY/when_someone_doesnt_understand_and_comprehend_the_substance_or_message_you_are_conveying_but_instead_points_out_the_flawed_structurecomposition_of_the_way_you_said_it_thus_concluding_youre_thinking_flawed_or_wrong.html#null
Not combative...
You are misinterpreting what logicallyfallacious is. What is asserted: Bad grammar is fallacious
argument. I counter that it's simply bad grammar. That is how formal argument works. There is no
disagreement.
_______________________________________________
ffmpeg-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email
[email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
