Hi, > What do you mean? > > split[A] select='not(eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3))' [C]interleave > [B]split[D]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,2)'[F]blend[D] > [E]select='eq(mod(n+1\,5)\,3)'[G] > > I created the filtergraph by hand. I don't know what folks expect, but since > duplicating pads (e.g., "[A] [A]") just takes up space, I didn't duplicate > them. I don't know whether that relates to "reuse filter pad labels". Could > you put some 'meat' on your 'bones'?
I meant using D twice. I thought it might create a cycle or something but since the first pair of [D] were linked to each other I guess that means you could use it again for blend's output pad. For the actual filter though, should it look better on a 60Hz vertical refresh panel than 120Hz? I don't fully understand the rationale, but I was curious and tried it, on film material I can't tell the difference but animation looks horrible at 120Hz (like I'm dizzy, like a slow motion blur effect at regular speed?) but it's fine at 60Hz. Regards, Ted Park _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-user mailing list [email protected] https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email [email protected] with subject "unsubscribe".
